World Boxing Association

WBA Scores Analysis



back to master scores

AMIR KHAN vs PAUL MALIGNAGGI - 2010-05-15


CONSISTENT ROUNDS (Judges voted equal)

Register the consistent rounds to each boxer with the accumulated scoring
BOXERS NAMESROUNDSTOTAL ROUNDSPOINTS ACCUMULATEDADVANTAGE
round numbers that won or drew each boxer in the tree judges score cardsconsistentin the consistent roundsadvantage in points for the boxer
AMIR KHAN1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1010010
PAUL MALIGNAGGI090

INCONSISTENT ROUNDS (Judges scored different)

Number of the rounds that judges scored to the boxers and/or draw
ROUND NoROUND WON BYROUND WON BYDRAW ROUNDSPOINTS ACCUMULATEDADVANTAGE
AMIR KHANPAUL MALIGNAGGIAMIR KHAN
100
PAUL MALIGNAGGI
90

Judge A: GLENN FELDMAN0 % inconsistent
Judge B: STEVE WEISFELD0 % inconsistent
Judge C: TERRY O'CONNOR0 % inconsistent


THEORICAL SCORE: AMIR KHAN 100 - 90 PAUL MALIGNAGGI


back to master scores